The quick answer
Start here
Compare the actual investment option over a matching period and understand what a benchmark measures. A past winner, a fund-wide label and an APRA test result each answer different questions.
Find the option before comparing the fund
A super fund can offer cash, conservative, balanced, growth and other investment choices. Two people in the same fund may therefore experience different returns. A headline describing the fund's best-performing option does not necessarily describe the option holding your money.
Open the statement and identify the exact product and option names, along with any split between options. Then find the matching performance information. Labels such as balanced are useful starting descriptions but do not guarantee identical asset exposures across providers. Compare underlying allocations and risk information as well as the word on the menu. Otherwise a higher-return option may simply have taken more growth-asset risk, making an apparent provider comparison partly a comparison of different investment jobs.
Use the same dates and measurement basis
A return to 30 June and a return to 31 December can describe very different market periods. A one-year result, a five-year cumulative gain and an annualised five-year return also are not interchangeable. Keep start and end dates beside each number and check whether income is reinvested.
For a fictional example, an account investment component growing from $10,000 to $12,100 over two years with no external cash flows has 21% cumulative growth and 10% compound annual growth. Calling both figures annual returns would be incorrect. Actual super statements also contain contributions, tax, insurance and fees. The change in your total balance is not automatically the investment return. Reconcile those account movements before deciding that the fund's published return must be wrong.
After fees needs a follow-up question
A performance figure may allow for investment costs while excluding administration, insurance or personal advice charges. Another table might use a representative balance rather than your own. Ask which deductions are included and where the remaining costs appear.
A fictional option earning $6,000 after investment costs on a stated example balance can still have separately deducted administration and insurance amounts. Do not subtract an included investment cost twice, or assume excluded charges are zero. Compare the complete account experience while keeping investment performance and insurance protection conceptually distinct. Removing insurance can improve an account's short-term balance without improving the investment return or leaving the member adequately protected. The purpose is a fair reconciliation, not simply finding the smallest visible deduction.
What the YourSuper comparison tool contributes
The ATO's YourSuper tool is intended to compare MySuper products, with personalised and non-personalised access routes. It can help organise information such as performance and fees under its stated definitions. It is not a complete catalogue of every possible investment option or personal recommendation.
Check the product coverage, date and assumptions displayed in the tool. If your chosen option is not represented, do not assign it the result of a different product merely because both belong to the same fund. APRA explains that the comparison information is supplied from its data. Follow the tool's current help text and retain the details of any comparison you use. A concise official view is valuable precisely when its scope is understood rather than expanded beyond what it measures.
Sources: APRA: performance-test framework and YourSuper information · ATO: YourSuper comparison tool
A performance test is not a forecast
APRA conducts the annual performance test for products within its prescribed scope. The test uses a defined methodology and benchmarks. A result should be read in that context, including the relevant year and product, rather than interpreted as a prediction of next year's return.
Passing does not make an investment risk-free or prove that it is suitable for every member. A benchmark comparison and a league table of raw returns can also differ because they answer different questions. Check current official results and communications rather than relying on an old screenshot shared without the product name. This article does not publish a winner list or claim that every fund option is tested in exactly the same way. Use the regulator's own description for the current coverage and methodology.
Source: APRA: performance-test framework and YourSuper information
A benchmark should resemble the investment's job
Comparing an Australian-share option with a cash benchmark says little about whether it implemented its intended exposure well. A useful benchmark needs an appropriate asset mix, currency treatment and period. Even then, fees, taxes and implementation can explain part of the difference.
For a personal worksheet, write the option objective, asset allocation, published benchmark and whether the comparison is before or after relevant costs. If the fund has changed the option materially, note that a long performance history may span more than one design. Ask how the history is presented after mergers or lifecycle changes. A ten-year number is not automatically more informative if the product's current structure differs from what generated much of that history.
Keep switching consequences in the review
A poor comparison result can justify asking more questions, but moving an entire account has consequences beyond a return table. Review insurance, beneficiary nominations, fees, available options, outstanding personal-contribution notices and any relevant timing conditions before acting.
MoneySmart's choosing-a-super-fund guidance includes these broader features. Do not assume a new fund will reproduce its historical return after you join. High-pressure promises and attractive recent numbers deserve scrutiny. A proper review can conclude that more information is needed, an option within the same fund deserves consideration, or individual advice is appropriate. The next action should follow the complete position rather than a reflex to switch whenever a new annual winner is announced.
Use the projection as a sensitivity check
The Elaris super model can show how different selected returns, contributions and fees affect a simplified future balance. It cannot rank products, verify an APRA result or predict which option will outperform. Enter assumptions on the basis described by the tool and avoid treating a best recent year as a sustainable annual return.
Keep a lower-return scenario and a clear record of excluded costs or rules. If two options differ in risk, do not compare them only by entering the higher historical figure for one and calling the resulting balance a recommendation. The model is useful for understanding sensitivity. The product decision needs current disclosures, personal access needs, risk capacity and, where appropriate, professional advice beyond the calculator's scope.
Explain balance growth before judging investment performance
A fictional account beginning at $50,000 can receive $8,000 of contributions, incur $1,000 of combined deductions and finish at $60,000. The $10,000 balance increase is not a 20% investment return. Under a simplified reconciliation, $3,000 remains attributable to investment movements before examining timing and the treatment of each deduction.
The appropriate percentage calculation still needs contribution dates and the provider's method. Use the example to separate cash flows from returns, not to derive a personal performance number from incomplete data. Ask for a statement reconciliation if the figures do not add up. It is easier to assess the option once new money and account charges are no longer being mistaken for investment skill or failure.
FAQ: Can two people in the same super fund have different returns?
Yes. They may hold different investment options or have different cash-flow timing and deductions. Find the exact option and account movements before comparing outcomes. A fund-wide headline or another member's balance change does not necessarily describe your own investment experience.
FAQ: Does passing APRA's test guarantee future performance?
No. The test assesses products within its scope using a defined historical methodology. It is not a forecast, guarantee or personalised suitability assessment. Read the current result for the specific product and consider its risk and other account features separately.
FAQ: Is the highest one-year return the best super option?
Not necessarily. Period choice, risk exposure and costs can change the comparison. A recent winner may have taken different risks or benefited from a particular market. Use matching periods and option exposures, while recognising that past returns do not establish future results.
FAQ: Does Elaris recommend a fund from the projected balance?
No. It models entered assumptions and does not verify providers or rank products. A larger output caused by a higher assumed return is not evidence that a fund will deliver it. Keep the product review separate from a transparent sensitivity exercise.
Put the next step into practice
Use your own confirmed figures and keep outstanding questions visible. Core tools are free, with no bank connection or compulsory account.
Open the Super projection ↗Sources and editorial notes
Sources checked 25 October 2026. Worked examples are fictional illustrations. Rules, eligibility and product terms can change; use the official source for your circumstances.
- Moneysmart: choosing and comparing a super fund ↗
- APRA: performance-test framework and YourSuper information ↗
- ATO: YourSuper comparison tool ↗
General information, not an individual financial or legal assessment. AI-assisted drafting with source checks; independent professional review has not been completed. How we prepare our guides · Suggest a correction